OVERVIEWWe Media connects individuals and organizations from across industries who believe the power of media, communication and human ingenuity should be applied to innovate in business AND to make the world better through media. READ MORE VIDEOVideo archives are now being made available. Click on the following links to view video from the following sessions:
Indigenous World DOWNLOADABLE AUDIOWe are posting downloadable MP3 files of every session. The files available for download are in the player below and more will be posted soon. MOBILEGet the schedule and other details on your phone - powered by Proteus LIVE CHATFollow the major sessions and contribute instant feedback, Ah Hah's and questions in the live chat room on wemediacommunity.org
Click on the video to add subtitles using dotSUB in any language. Hit the up/down arrow at the lower right side of the player, to scroll through languages while watching the video and select a different language.
ADD A BADGE |
Social Entrepreneurs
By: robpark
“Journalism should have a profound social impact,” said Alberto Ibarguen, president of the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. This quote defines the root of the Knight Foundation’s partnership with the Ashoka: Innovator for the Public.
The Knight Foundation will invest $3 million in Ashoka to find social entrepreneurial journalists. This partnership will fund fellowships to 30 lucky and hard working journalists for three years.
Both organizations are looking for journalist that will create social change in geographically specific communities. But this partnership will be, “a tension filled relationship” according to Ibarguen.
The Knight foundation has historically been focused on journalism from a American perspective while Ashoka has its roots in a global context. That tension as well as other criteria distinguishing quality journalism from advocacy will have to be worked out between the two massive organizations.
However, Diana Wells, president of Ashoka, clearly defines the qualities they are looking for in a journalist:
- Creativity – An ability to combine visionary goal setting with a practical approach.
- Entrepreneurial quality – A total commitment to changing patterns and systems.
- Commitment to social impact – The potential of the idea to solve an endemic problem.
- Ethical fiber – An ability to inspire others by strength of character and integrity.
(Taken Directly From Ashoka’s website: http://www.ashoka.org/node/3833)
Once the fellows are selected they will receive three years of funding. Ashoka will also provide a community of peers to help and encourage the fellow while providing professional network. Ashoka hopes this will “mid-wife” the idea.
According to Wells, 95% of Ashoka’s fellow are still working on their projects after five years, in contrast to a 5% success rate small business start-up given the same time.
While the odds of a project succeeding are rather high, odds of a receiving a fellowship is rather dicey.
Deron Triff, founder and CEO of Changents a for profit business, questioned both Ibarguen and Wells about their stance in funding non-profit organizations over for-profit. Wells and Ibargeun both recognized that for-profit business can be socially conscious and can be more effective than non-profits. However, neither answer seemed to satisfy the heart of Triff’s question.
Another audience member also asked how these organizations recognize “innovation,” an inherently difficult task. While thinking outside the box maybe innovative it could also be seen as socially unacceptable and therefore never adopted. Again the answer doesn’t really seem to provide an insight to receiving a fellowship.
Yet, this shouldn’t stop anyone from applying for the fellowship, just don’t bank on it.
“Journalism should have a profound social impact,” said Alberto Ibarguen, president of the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. This quote defines the root of the Knight Foundation’s partnership with the Ashoka: Innovator for the Public.
The Knight Foundation will invest $3 million in Ashoka to find social entrepreneurial journalists. This partnership will fund fellowships to 30 lucky and hard working journalists for three years.
Both organizations are looking for journalist that will create social change in geographically specific communities. But this partnership will be, “a tension filled relationship” according to Ibarguen.
The Knight foundation has historically been focused on journalism from a American perspective while Ashoka has its roots in a global context. That tension as well as other criteria distinguishing quality journalism from advocacy will have to be worked out between the two massive organizations.
However, Diana Wells, president of Ashoka, clearly defines the qualities they are looking for in a journalist:
- Creativity – An ability to combine visionary goal setting with a practical approach.
- Entrepreneurial quality – A total commitment to changing patterns and systems.
- Commitment to social impact – The potential of the idea to solve an endemic problem.
- Ethical fiber – An ability to inspire others by strength of character and integrity.
(Taken Directly From Ashoka’s website: http://www.ashoka.org/node/3833)
Once the fellows are selected they will receive three years of funding. Ashoka will also provide a community of peers to help and encourage the fellow while providing professional network. Ashoka hopes this will “mid-wife” the idea.
According to Wells, 95% of Ashoka’s fellow are still working on their projects after five years, in contrast to a 5% success rate small business start-up given the same time.
While the odds of a project succeeding are rather high, odds of a receiving a fellowship is rather dicey.
Deron Triff, founder and CEO of Changents a for profit business, questioned both Ibarguen and Wells about their stance in funding non-profit organizations over for-profit. Wells and Ibargeun both recognized that for-profit business can be socially conscious and can be more effective than non-profits. However, neither answer seemed to satisfy the heart of Triff’s question.
Another audience member also asked how these organizations recognize “innovation,” an inherently difficult task. While thinking outside the box maybe innovative it could also be seen as socially unacceptable and therefore never adopted. Again the answer doesn’t really seem to provide an insight to receiving a fellowship.
Yet, this shouldn’t stop anyone from applying for the fellowship, just don’t bank on it.
tags:We Media Miami 20085 Comments so far
Leave a reply



































[...] and they answered some questions about it. Here are some of our live blogging team’s initial notes from that conversation, further thinking from Susan Mernit and Ogilvy’s John Bell, and here’s the formal press [...]
Thanks for posting additional information on that session.
Also, due to time constraints of “Live Blogging” I failed to be transparent about my bias. This definitely influenced my perspective and I was torn between giving an “objective” story and opinion blogging.
First, I applied for last years Knight News Challenge with a for-profit project and was denied.
Secondly, I copy edited “PeaceMaker” a video game about the Israel-Palestine conflict that won an award from Ashoka.
But thankfully Internet technology allows for these post facto additions to reports. But this also highlights some ethical difficulties that new technology raises.
Just another example of how technology is changing journalism and why conferences of this nature are necessary. (Oh by the way, I was also awarded a fellowship to this conference so another possible bias.)
Amen to socially responsible businesses (and consumers). You should check out http://www.scuppie.com — lots of funny info on Scuppies (Socially Conscious Upwardly-mobile People).
Chuck
[...] ENTREPRENEURS: Journalism as a Cause (Keynote): Blogged by Rob Park (with additional wrap-up by Andrew [...]
[...] Blogged by Rob Park (with additional wrap-up by Andrew Nachison) tags:We Media Miami 2008Share This [...]