<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The We Media News Gap: Help dream up better journalism for Silicon Valley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ifocos.org/2008/04/09/the-we-media-news-gap-help-dream-up-better-journalism-for-silicon-valley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ifocos.org/2008/04/09/the-we-media-news-gap-help-dream-up-better-journalism-for-silicon-valley/</link>
	<description>INSTITUTE FOR THE CONNECTED SOCIETY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 23:19:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Nachison</title>
		<link>http://ifocos.org/2008/04/09/the-we-media-news-gap-help-dream-up-better-journalism-for-silicon-valley/comment-page-1/#comment-47767</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Nachison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifocos.org/2008/04/09/the-we-media-news-gap-help-dream-up-better-journalism-for-silicon-valley/#comment-47767</guid>
		<description>Andrea, I wish I could deliver and start ripping, but I thought Eric Alterman did a nice job with the New Yorker story. It was vastly more thoughtful than a disdainful &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/08/07/060807fa_fact1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog-bashing essay &lt;/a&gt;by Nicholas Lemann, dean of the Columbia University Journalism School, published in the New Yorker in 2006.

I&#039;m not even going to rip Alterman&#039;s nostalgia, or mythology, for a national dialog defined by The New York Times, or the implication that The Huffington Post is ultimately inferior to a real newspaper because it lacks sports and book sections.

Those may be windows into the author&#039;s heart, and there&#039;s nothing wrong with that. He also quoted The Simpsons.

Yes, I find today&#039;s diversity of media experiences, expectations and inclinations more compelling than the preferences of any one individual, even one who writes for The New Yorker, loves The New York Times and can&#039;t fathom a national dialog without it. I can, but Alterman (and The Simpsons) got the big story right: the future of high-priced institutional journalism as practiced or preached for the past half century by enormously profitable U.S. newspaper companies, like The Times, is undoubtedly dimmer than its past, at least in the near-term. The monolithic institutions that crafted, packaged and delivered to our doorsteps the first rough-draft of multiple genocides, the planet&#039;s deadliest wars ever, depopulating hunger, suburbanization, urban decay, racial and ethnic animosities and atrocities, and expanding economic inequities between rich and poor are themselves in decline. 

But the world is changing. It&#039;s hard for me to think about journalism or my narrative strictly in terms of U.S. companies, national interest and national dialog - the We Media news network is at once global, hyperlocal and borderless.

I&#039;m optimistic that the world of We Media will be better-informed than the world of THE media. I hope new institutions or networks of institutions and individuals will fill the void. Since 9/11 the U.S. online audience for The Guardian, a left-leaning &quot;serious&quot; newspaper from London, has exploded and is now a competitor to The Times for online audiences and influence. So, too, is The Huffington Post. Others will follow.

 Our national, global or local consciousness may be clouded by the confusion of the crowd, or informed by its wisdom AND by big but somewhat less profitable institutions. We still don&#039;t know. The emergence of the We Media culture has only just begun. Maybe I&#039;ll write a We Media narrative for The New Yorker. If I do, I hope I can get as much right as Alterman got in his story of The Media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, I wish I could deliver and start ripping, but I thought Eric Alterman did a nice job with the New Yorker story. It was vastly more thoughtful than a disdainful <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/08/07/060807fa_fact1" rel="nofollow">blog-bashing essay </a>by Nicholas Lemann, dean of the Columbia University Journalism School, published in the New Yorker in 2006.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not even going to rip Alterman&#8217;s nostalgia, or mythology, for a national dialog defined by The New York Times, or the implication that The Huffington Post is ultimately inferior to a real newspaper because it lacks sports and book sections.</p>
<p>Those may be windows into the author&#8217;s heart, and there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that. He also quoted The Simpsons.</p>
<p>Yes, I find today&#8217;s diversity of media experiences, expectations and inclinations more compelling than the preferences of any one individual, even one who writes for The New Yorker, loves The New York Times and can&#8217;t fathom a national dialog without it. I can, but Alterman (and The Simpsons) got the big story right: the future of high-priced institutional journalism as practiced or preached for the past half century by enormously profitable U.S. newspaper companies, like The Times, is undoubtedly dimmer than its past, at least in the near-term. The monolithic institutions that crafted, packaged and delivered to our doorsteps the first rough-draft of multiple genocides, the planet&#8217;s deadliest wars ever, depopulating hunger, suburbanization, urban decay, racial and ethnic animosities and atrocities, and expanding economic inequities between rich and poor are themselves in decline. </p>
<p>But the world is changing. It&#8217;s hard for me to think about journalism or my narrative strictly in terms of U.S. companies, national interest and national dialog &#8211; the We Media news network is at once global, hyperlocal and borderless.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m optimistic that the world of We Media will be better-informed than the world of THE media. I hope new institutions or networks of institutions and individuals will fill the void. Since 9/11 the U.S. online audience for The Guardian, a left-leaning &#8220;serious&#8221; newspaper from London, has exploded and is now a competitor to The Times for online audiences and influence. So, too, is The Huffington Post. Others will follow.</p>
<p> Our national, global or local consciousness may be clouded by the confusion of the crowd, or informed by its wisdom AND by big but somewhat less profitable institutions. We still don&#8217;t know. The emergence of the We Media culture has only just begun. Maybe I&#8217;ll write a We Media narrative for The New Yorker. If I do, I hope I can get as much right as Alterman got in his story of The Media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrea useem</title>
		<link>http://ifocos.org/2008/04/09/the-we-media-news-gap-help-dream-up-better-journalism-for-silicon-valley/comment-page-1/#comment-47158</link>
		<dc:creator>andrea useem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifocos.org/2008/04/09/the-we-media-news-gap-help-dream-up-better-journalism-for-silicon-valley/#comment-47158</guid>
		<description>Also, I&#039;m longing to hear the iFOCOS take on the New Yorker article. It was painfully out of date (not coincidence that many of the quotes he used were from 2005 -- and Alterman writes as if he&#039;s the first to discover the &quot;irony&quot; that much of the online world feeds on copy produced by professional journalists), not to mention comes down ultimately on the nostalgia/democracy-will-come-to-an-end-when-newspapers-die side. I&#039;d love to hear Andrew and Dale rip it apart.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I&#8217;m longing to hear the iFOCOS take on the New Yorker article. It was painfully out of date (not coincidence that many of the quotes he used were from 2005 &#8212; and Alterman writes as if he&#8217;s the first to discover the &#8220;irony&#8221; that much of the online world feeds on copy produced by professional journalists), not to mention comes down ultimately on the nostalgia/democracy-will-come-to-an-end-when-newspapers-die side. I&#8217;d love to hear Andrew and Dale rip it apart&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrea useem</title>
		<link>http://ifocos.org/2008/04/09/the-we-media-news-gap-help-dream-up-better-journalism-for-silicon-valley/comment-page-1/#comment-47157</link>
		<dc:creator>andrea useem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ifocos.org/2008/04/09/the-we-media-news-gap-help-dream-up-better-journalism-for-silicon-valley/#comment-47157</guid>
		<description>Telling that the Mercury-News isn&#039;t organizing this itself! The conference will take some skillful moderating, lest it descend into, &quot;why don&#039;t you cover my [pet cause, hobby]?&quot; Will the newspaper listen? Does it matter if they did? The irony is summed up in the attendance of Mansfield who will be departing anyways. How about a meeting (not sure why it needs to be called an unconference) bringing together not just community folks and the dying newspaper, but other  online outlets -- ValleyWag for one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telling that the Mercury-News isn&#8217;t organizing this itself! The conference will take some skillful moderating, lest it descend into, &#8220;why don&#8217;t you cover my [pet cause, hobby]?&#8221; Will the newspaper listen? Does it matter if they did? The irony is summed up in the attendance of Mansfield who will be departing anyways. How about a meeting (not sure why it needs to be called an unconference) bringing together not just community folks and the dying newspaper, but other  online outlets &#8212; ValleyWag for one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

